Legal Opinion

H. J. Keith Co. v. Booth Fisheries Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 3, 1913PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Summons Case (No. 127, September Term, 1912) to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff on acounfc of the negligence of the defendant in failing to keep in good and proper condition in the defendant’s cold storage warehouse a large quantity of frozen egg product, the property of the plaintiff. See on demurrer to declaration, ante, also 86 Atl. 166.

1Opinion of the Court

Pennewill, C. J.,

charging the jury:

Gentlemen of the jury:—The present action was brought by the plaintiff, the H. J. Keith Company, against the defendant, the Booth Fisheries Company, for damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff on account of the negligence of the defendant in failing to keep in good and proper condition a large quantity of frozen egg product, the property of the plaintiff, in the defendant’s cold storage warehouse in Chicago in the years 1909 and 1910.

The plaintiff’s claim for damages is two thousand, three hundred and eighty-seven dollars and ninety-nine…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ballston Refrigerating Storage Co. v. Eastern States Refrigerating Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  2. Doane & Jones Lumber Co. v. Essex Building & Land Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1900
  3. Pusey v. WebbSuperior Court of Delaware · 1900

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. WSMW Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1980
  2. Demotte v. WhybrowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  3. Superior Tube Co. v. Delaware Aircraft Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
  4. Lopeman v. GeeWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Traders Compress Co. v. PrecureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API