Legal Opinion

Doane & Jones Lumber Co. v. Essex Building & Land Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 29, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stevens, V. C.

The application in this case is misconceived. It is substantially a demurrer to the answer. Such a demurrer is not recognized in the books. Travers v. Ross, 1 McCart. 254. Rule 213 provides that any objections to any pleading or to any part thereof may be adjudicated upon on motion without the filing of a demurrer or exceptions, but the notice of such motion must state the particular ground or grounds of objection. By force of this rule such an application, in the case of an answer, does no more than take the place of exceptions, and is to be decided by the rules which apply in.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. H. J. Keith Co. v. Booth Fisheries Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1913
  2. Ireland v. KellyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1900
  3. U.S. Industries, Inc. v. GreggDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978
  4. Zweig v. ZweigNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  5. Alexander v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API