Lopeman v. Gee

Defendant appeals from a judgment against him based upon his alleged négligence in storing onions belonging to plaintiffs.

At the outset, respondents argue that the findings of the trial court must be accepted as the established facts of the case because none of appellant’s assignments points to' any error of the trial court, as required by Rule on Appeal 43, 34A Wn. (2d) 47, which provides;

“No alleged error of the superior court will be considered by this court unless the same be definitely pointed out in the ‘assignments of error’ in appellant’s brief. In appeals from all actions at law or…