Demotte v. Whybrow
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action by Clarence Whybrow against Phillip .G. J. Demotte. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
The plaintiff below has brought an action 'to recover the sum of $41,965.35 alleged to be due and owing from defendant for work and labor done, and services and materials furnished him, between January 14, 1918, and March 30, 1918, in the alteration of certain premises in the city of New York. The referee found that the amount unpaid and due *367to the plaintiff was the sum of $41,748.35, and he allowed the plaintiff interest on this sum in the amount of $2,517.93, and the total amount for which judgment has been entered, including costs…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Faber v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- David Lupton's Sons Co. v. Automobile Club of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Finlen v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- McMahon v. . the New York and Erie Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Van Rensselaer v. JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Louisiana & Arkansas Ry. Co. v. PrattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- City of Cleveland v. Walsh Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Thompson-Starrett Co. v. La Belle Iron WorksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Robertson v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.