Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 18, 1916No. 4204PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PBENDEBGAST, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted for making an unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor in the prohibition county of Somervell and assessed the lowest punishment.

By its first witness, ,D. M., or Dock, Martin, on direct examination, the State clearly and positively made out its case against appellant, and rested without introducing any other witness. Appellant did not testify. His claim was that he had ordered the whisky for and at the instance of his uncle, Mess Martin. He then introduced Mess-Martin, who was quite an old man, 84 or 85 years old, he himself testifying that he…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ryan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Tubb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Byrd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Payton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joseph Costello v. United States of America, Joseph John Cannella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API