Byrd v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HARPER, Judge.
Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of pursuing the occupation of selling intoxicating liquors in local option territory, and his punishment assessed at two and one-half years confinement in the penitentiary.
Appellant moved to transfer this case to the County Court. This was decided adversely to the contention of appellant in the cases of Fitch v. State, 58 Texas Crim. Rep., 366; 127 S. W. Rep., 1040, and Mizell v. State, 59 Texas Crim. Rep., 226.
The indictment is also' assailed, but we do not deem it necessary to discuss all the grounds, they having been passed on so often…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ryan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Fitch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Slack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Mizell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- State v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Coffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Russell v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Vick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Luttrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.