Legal Opinion
Ackre v. Chapman & Chapman, P.C.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 2010No. 20100044PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Robert Ackre appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his action alleging Chapman and Chapman, P.C., committed an unlawful practice under N.D.C.C. ch. 51-15 and attorney misconduct under N.D.C.C. § 27-13-08. We hold Ackre does not have standing to sue Chapman and Chapman for attorney misconduct and Ackre has not raised a factual issue regarding his unlawful practice claim. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Ackre, a licensed North Dakota attorney, sued the law firm of Chapman and Chapman, alleging both he and Chapman and Chapman directly compete to represent enrolled members of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Securitron Magnalock Corp. v. SchnabolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Heslin v. Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo & TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Downers Grove Volkswagen, Inc. v. Wigglesworth Imports, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Olson v. FraaseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Loomis v. Ameritech Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Krenz v. XTO Energy, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Riverwood Commercial Park, LLC v. Standard Oil Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. KinsellaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- First International Bank & Trust v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Dakota Resource Council v. Stark County Board of County CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.