Legal Opinion

Krenz v. XTO Energy, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2017No. 20160096PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sandstrom, Surrogate Judge.

[¶ 1] XTO Energy, Inc., appeals and Darwin and Jean Krenz cross-appeal from a judgment awarding the Krenzes $800,000 for a pipeline trespass and ordering the parties to abide by certain documents for their future relationship after the district court construed a pipeline easement to authorize one pipeline on the Krenzes’ land and found XTO’s unauthorized construction and operation of a second pipeline on the Krenzes’ land and use of their private road was a trespass. We conclude an April 2007 pipeline easement is ambiguous and the court erred in construing the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hogan v. HoganNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. BTA Oil Producers v. MDU Resources Group, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hamilton v. WollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Egeland v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Missouri Breaks, LLC v. BurnsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. EOG Resources, Inc. v. Lucky Land Management, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
  2. Sorum v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Martin v. Marquee Pacific, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Riskey v. RiskeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Dixon v. DixonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API