Legal Opinion
People v. Hotz
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 14, 1927No. Docket No. 1519PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The defendant was convicted by the verdict of the jury with the offense of embezzlement and appeals from the judgment pronounced upon the verdict and an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The facts essential to an understanding of this appeal are as follows: C. B. James & Son were the owners and operators of a garage in San Fernando and as a part of that business sold new and used automobiles. Shortly before January 1, 1927, they orally entered into an agreement with the defendant whereby he was to sell new automobiles for them and to receive as his compensation, as stated by defendant,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Wheeler v. FarmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- State v. SandersArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Title Insurance and Trust Co. v. GriderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Gray v. YarbroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. SobiekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. CravensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Weingarten v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
- William Michael Webb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Dethlefsen v. StullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.