Legal Opinion

Meir v. Walton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 22, 1969No. 6910SC365PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYaughn, J.

The sole assignment of error brought forward by the defendants attacks the portion of the judgment which permanently restrains them from using that portion of the dirt path located on the property of the plaintiffs as shown on the map referred to by the court below when it determined the true and correct boundary between the parties. This exception is based on the fact that there was no demand for a permanent restraining order in the prayer for relief of the plaintiffs’ complaint.

G.S. 1-122 provides that the complaint must contain . . demand for the relief to which the plaintiff supposes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simms v. . SampsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Griggs v. . York-Shipley, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Pruitt v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Collins v. SimmsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Walter L. Compton, Jr. v. Alton Steamship Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  2. Childers v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Johnson v. Hartford Insurance GroupIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. MRD Motorsports, Inc. v. Trail Motorsports, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Oyster HR, Inc. v. Hubble Baby (HK) Ltd.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API