Legal Opinion

Pruitt v. Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1957No. 527PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

Our statute, G.S. 1-226, provides: “The relief granted to the plaintiff, if there is no answer, cannot exceed that demanded in his complaint . . .”

A default judgment rendered contrary to this statutory provision for an amount in excess of the damages alleged and the sum prayed for in the complaint is irregular. Simms v. Sampson, 221 N.C. 379, 20 S.E. 2d 554; Land Bank v. Davis, 215 N.C. 100, 1 S.E. 2d 350; Burrowes v. Burrowes, 210 N.C. 788, 188 S.E. 648; Smith v. Travelers Protective Assoc., 200 N.C. 740, 158 S.E. 402; White v. Snow, 71 N.C. 232.

An irregular judgment is one rendered contrary…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Carter v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Collins v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Fowler v. . FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Fowler v. . PoorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Company v. BarlarCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  2. Brown v. Cavit Sciences, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Menzel v. MenzelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. R. E. Uptegraff Manufacturing Co. v. International Union of Electrical Radio & Machine WorkersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Adamsen Construction Company v. AltendorfNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API