Legal Opinion
In Re Pulliam
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 15, 2001No. 17-10198PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEBTORS’ MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE AND FOR SANCTIONS AND HOLDING LEWIS & WEST, INC., IN CONTEMPT FOR VIOLATION OF THE AUTOMATIC STAY UNDER § 362(a).
ROBERT E. NUGENT, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter came before the Court for evidentiary hearing on April 17, 2001 concerning Debtors’ Amended Motion To Show Cause And For Sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr.P. 9020(b). On November 30, 2000, Arthur and Jaime Pulliam, debtors, filed their Motion To Show Cause why Lewis & West, a creditor, was not in contempt for violation of the automatic stay under § 362(a) which took effect on November 15,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- TranSouth Financial Corp. v. Sharon (In Re Sharon)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Diviney v. Nationsbank of Texas (In Re Diviney)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Miller v. Savings Bank of Baltimore (In Re Miller)District Court, D. Maryland · 1982
- Elder v. City of Thomasville (In Re Elder)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1981
- INSLAW, Inc. v. United States (In Re INSLAW, Inc.)District Court, District of Columbia · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lawrence Athletic Club v. Scroggin (In Re Scroggin)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- In re Dougherty-KelsayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
- In Re Williams-NoblesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Allen v. Capital One Bank (USA)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2020