Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Brady

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 22, 1965No. Civ. No. 5-63-116Published

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

This case was brought pursuant to the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, Title 29 United States Code § 401 et seq. It arises out of an amendment to the working agreement between defendant Brotherhood and the Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railroad (herein referred to as the railroad) affecting the seniority rights of plaintiffs.

The instant case arises out of a dispute between two locals of defendant Brotherhood. The railroad is divided into two divisions: the Missabe division and the Iron Range division. Local 319 of defendant Brotherhood represents the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Reserve Mining Company v. Mesabi Iron CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API