Pauley v. Ford Electronics and Refrigeration Corp.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION
HAMILTON, District Judge.
This case raises a deceptively simple question. Where an employer recruits a new employee by overstating (whether intentionally or negligently) the wage rate the emr ployee will be paid, and where wages are controlled by a collective bargaining agreement governed by federal law, does the new employee have any ability to recover damages for the employer’s false promise of representation, concerning the wage rate? The parties have identified, and the court has found, surprisingly little authority on this question. However, for reasons…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Howard v. LacyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Giant of Maryland, LLC v. TaylorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Smoldt v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Coleman v. Sterling Castings Corp. (In re Bluffton Castings Corp.)District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1998
- Stratoti v. Kroger Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.