Legal Opinion

Stratoti v. Kroger Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 30, 2002No. C2-01-1001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MARBLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Victoria Stratoti, filed this action in the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Ohio, against her former employer, The Kroger Company. Kroger timely removed the case to this Court on October 16, 2001. Stratoti then moved to remand, asserting that her complaint stated claims only under state law and not, as Kroger contended, claims which are completely preempted by § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185. Kroger has opposed the motion to remand. For the following reasons, Stratoti’s motion to remand will be…

2Cases cited16 opinions

Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
Lodge 76, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Debeikes v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2015