Legal Opinion

United States v. Nam Van Hoang

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 23, 2011No. 09-30484PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Nam Van Hoang (“Hoang”) appeals from his conviction for failure to register pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”). Hoang was convicted of a sex offense and registered as a sex offender under state law prior to the enactment of SORNA, which requires a sex offender to register in each jurisdiction where he resides and to keep his registration current. Section 2250 of Title 18 prohibits sex offenders who are required to register under SORNA from traveling in interstate commerce and knowingly failing to register. Hoang’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Reno v. KoraySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Arlington v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  2. In re BP P.L.C. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
  3. United States v. Daniel StanfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Nobryan McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. NazerzadehCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API