Legal Opinion

Childers v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1895No. 1,605PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Ross, J. —

Appellant brought this action against the appellee to recover for injuries to stock which entered on its right of way at a point where its fence was out of repair. The stock, after they got upon the right of way, became frightened at one of appellee’s trains, and, running along the railroad track, jumped into a trestle and were injured. They were not struck by the locomotive or cars.

It is insisted by the appellant that the appellee’s fail*687ure to maintain a fence along its right of way, as required by statute, constituted negligence and if his stock escaped by reason of appellee’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis Railroad v. DunlapIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Indianapolis, Bloomington, & Western R. W. Co. v. McBrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Baltimore, Pittsburgh & Chicago R. W. Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ShawIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Campbell v. Indianapolis & Northwestern Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Cleveland v. VincentIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Central Indiana Railway Co. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Crum v. ConoverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API