Indianapolis, Bloomington, & Western R. W. Co. v. McBrown
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Fountain Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBdskirk, J.
The assignments of error call in question the action of the court in overruling the demurrer to the amended complaint and the motion for a new trial. The allegations of the complaint were fully proved upon the trial. The verdict of the jury was fully supported by the evidence. The ■only question for our decision is, whether, upon the facts averred in the complaint, the appellant is liable.
The amended or substituted complaint, omitting the for¡mal parts, is as follows:
“ Elam S. McBrown, the above named plaintiff complains of ■the Indianapolis, Bloomington, and Western Railway Com;pany,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Peru & Indianapolis Railroad v. HasketIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by16 opinions
- Palmer v. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Citizens' Street Railroad v. WilloebyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Wabash Railway Co. v. ForsheeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Lary v. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.