Legal Opinion

Indianapolis, Bloomington, & Western R. W. Co. v. McBrown

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1874PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Fountain Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBdskirk, J.

The assignments of error call in question the action of the court in overruling the demurrer to the amended complaint and the motion for a new trial. The allegations of the complaint were fully proved upon the trial. The verdict of the jury was fully supported by the evidence. The ■only question for our decision is, whether, upon the facts averred in the complaint, the appellant is liable.

The amended or substituted complaint, omitting the for¡mal parts, is as follows:

“ Elam S. McBrown, the above named plaintiff complains of ■the Indianapolis, Bloomington, and Western Railway Com;pany,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peru & Indianapolis Railroad v. HasketIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Citizens' Street Railroad v. WilloebyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Wabash Railway Co. v. ForsheeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Lary v. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API