Boscaglia v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
The principal question is whether the exclusive remedy provision of the workers’ compensation act 1 bars an action seeking recovery for physical, mental, or emotional injury resulting from an employer’s violation of the fair employment practices act (FEPA) 2 or the Michigan civil rights act. 3 We hold that it does not.
We further hold that an employee’s spouse does not have a derivative cause of action for loss of consortium as a result of an employer’s violation of the FEPA.
I
Irene M. Boscaglia worked for Michigan Bell Telephone Company from September 24, 1953, until August 11, 1977. By…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Universities Research Assn., Inc. v. CoutuSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pompey v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Meyers v. Chapman Printing Co., Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- Reese v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
- Brewster v. Martin Marietta Aluminum Sales, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Miller v. C a Muer Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Eide v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.