Legal Opinion

Boscaglia v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1985No. Docket Nos. 68327, 70044. (Calendar Nos. 13, 14)PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The principal question is whether the exclusive remedy provision of the workers’ compensation act 1 bars an action seeking recovery for physical, mental, or emotional injury resulting from an employer’s violation of the fair employment practices act (FEPA) 2 or the Michigan civil rights act. 3 We hold that it does not.

We further hold that an employee’s spouse does not have a derivative cause of action for loss of consortium as a result of an employer’s violation of the FEPA.

I

Irene M. Boscaglia worked for Michigan Bell Telephone Company from September 24, 1953, until August 11, 1977. By…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Universities Research Assn., Inc. v. CoutuSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Pompey v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Meyers v. Chapman Printing Co., Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Reese v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Brewster v. Martin Marietta Aluminum Sales, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Miller v. C a Muer Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Eide v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API