W. G. Blanchard & Co. v. Ezell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
■ Error from. McClain County Court; E. E. Glaseo, Judge. Action by W.' G. Blanchard & Co. against S. L. Ezell. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error. Citing: Sivope v. Burnham, 6 Okla. 736.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, C. J.
The plaintiff in error is a copartnership, composed of W. D. Blanchard, Annie O. Blanchard, and A. H. 'Blanchard. Prior to statehood the firm engaged in the mercantile business at Purcell, Ind. T., and after statehood continued in the same business at the same place. Long prior to statehood S. L. Ezell, the defendant in error, became indebted to the copartnership upon a promissory note, executed and delivered to it at its. place of business at Purcell. After statehood the firm brought suit on the note before a justice of the peace at Purcell. As a defense the defendant set up noneompliance…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- A. W. Swope & Son v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Patterson v. RousneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Metropolitan Ry. Co. v. FonvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Fitch v. BraddockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Tague v. Guaranty State Bank of DrumrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.