Legal Opinion
Handi Investment Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 1981No. 78-2953PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge:
This is the second time these parties have come before this court. The first go-around was an appeal from summary judgment, Handi Inv. Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp., 550 F.2d 543 (9th Cir. 1977), (Handi I), and the facts are set out there. Upon remand, a jury trial resulted in a verdict in favor of defendant Mobil Oil. Handi argues the district court erred in instructing the jury that both parties to a loan agreement must intend to violate the usury laws, and had to enter into a loan agreement in “bad faith,” in order to find Mobil in violation of California’s usury law.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- White v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- McConnell v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Baruch Inv. Co. v. HuntoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
3Cited by24 opinions
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Hector Rivera-Martinez, A/K/A El MenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Richardson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Knowlton Merritt v. John E. MacKey and Jerry Howard, Knowlton Merritt v. John E. MacKey Steve VincentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Alder Creek Water Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.