Legal Opinion
Lechner v. Holmberg
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 8, 1973PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, C. J.
This was an action in the nature of mandamus taken to compel the defendants, who are a court reporter, a court clerk and the chief judge of the Circuit Court, to release to the plaintiff a transcript of the criminal proceedings against him in the Circuit Court, third circuit, at Danbury. The Superior Court, after a hearing on an order to show cause, issued the order of mandamus. The defendants appealed to this court.
The plaintiff was involved in an automobile accident on February 10, 1970. Criminal charges were brought against him as a result of the accident. On a trial in the Circuit Court,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Kaplan v. Merberg Wrecking CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Rathkopf v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Doe v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Doe v. Institute of Living, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- State v. MorowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Zoning Commission v. Fairfield Resources Management, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.