Legal Opinion
Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided March 4, 2003No. 02-1034PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEDEMEYER, EJ.
¶ 1. Steven C. Tietsworth appeals from an order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. Tietsworth originally filed a proposed class action lawsuit against Harley-Davidson (Harley) asserting individual and representative claims for: (1) violation of Wis. Stat. § 100.18 (1999-2000) 1 , the Wisconsin Deceptive Trade Fractices Act ("DTFA"); (2) negligence; (3) strict products liability; and (4) common law fraudulent concealment. He now seeks review of the trial court's dismissal of his fraudulent concealment and DTFA claims; he does not appeal the dismissal of his…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Leardi v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Williams v. Purdue Pharma Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Wallis v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Pilar Domer v. Menard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- State v. Abbott LaboratoriesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.