Legal Opinion

Singer v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1960No. S. F. 20384PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Petitioner (hereafter referred to as “plaintiff”) seeks by mandate to compel the real party in interest (hereafter referred to as “defendant”) to answer certain interrogatories which it refused to answer, and which respondent court ruled it did not have to answer. It is our conclusion that the writ should issue.

Plaintiff brought an action for personal injuries under the Jones Act (46 TJ.S.C.§ 688) against several parties, of which defendant is one. The complaint alleges, among other things, the fact of plaintiff’s employment as a seaman on the SS Ocean Deborah, the relationship of each of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dewhirst v. LeopoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Perry v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Heffron v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. RCA Mfg. Co. v. Decca Records, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  5. Gutowitz v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Coy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API