Legal Opinion

Cable One, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 11, 2013No. 1 CA-TX 12-0006PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORRIS, Judge.

¶ 1 The Arizona Legislature has directed the Arizona Department of Revenue to value “centrally assessed property.” Ariz.Rev. Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § 42-14001 (2006). Centrally assessed property includes, for example, mines, mills, smelters, certain utilities, and, at issue here, telecommunications companies. A.R.S. § 42-14401 (2006).

¶ 2 In 2009, the Department concluded Cable One, Inc. was a “telecommunications company” subject to central assessment because, through its Voice over Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) service, it was providing telephone service to its subscribers. Cable…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  3. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Courtney M. Kay-Decker, Director, Iowa Department of Revenue v. Iowa State Board of Tax Review and Cable One, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. Cable One, Inc. v. N.M. Taxation & Revenue Dep'tNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Cable One, Inc. v. N.M. Taxation & Revenue Dep'tNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. SolarCity Corp. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  5. Courtney M. Kay-Decker, Director, Iowa Department of Revenue v. Iowa State Board of Tax Review and Cable One, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API