Goldberg v. Sweet
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall
In this appeal, we must decide whether a tax on interstate telecommunications imposed by the State of Illinois violates the Commerce Clause. We hold that it does not.
I
A
These cases come to us against a backdrop of massive technological and legal changes in the telecommunications industry.1 Years ago, all interstate telephone calls were relayed through electric wires and transferred by human operators working switchboards. Those days are past. Today, a computerized network of electronic paths transmits thousands of electronic signals per minute through a complex system of microwave radios,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wardair Canada Inc. v. Florida Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by296 opinions
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. HealySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. WynneSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. Director, Division of Taxation, New Jersey Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
291 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.