Ford & Sanborn Co. v. Braslan Seed Growers Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County, and from an order denying a new trial. B. V. Sargent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action in assicmpsit for goods, wares and merchandise sold to defendants by plaintiff. The complaint is verified. Defendants Braslan Seed Growers Co. and Charles P. Braslan filed their verified answer, specifically denying the averments of the complaint so far as they related to the alleged sale of the goods. Defendants G. T. and W. F. Duncan answered in their own proper persons as follows: “The defendants G. T. Duncan and W. F. Duncan, hereby enter this their appearance in the above-entitled case, and deny each and every allegation of the complaint.” The cause was tried by a jury…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Senter v. De BernalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Herriman v. MenziesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Johnson v. Phenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Mitchell v. California & Oregon Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Hicks v. MastenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MacDonald v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- National Bank of California v. MulfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911