Legal Opinion

Maisano v. Welcher

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 30, 1991No. 89-16004PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs Ralph J. and Audrey D. Maisa-no appeal pro se the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants in an action for return of property seized by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to satisfy the Maisanos’ outstanding tax liabilities. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

This action arises out of the Maisanos’ failure to pay tax deficiencies assessed against them for the tax years 1982, 1988, and 1984. The Maisanos’ liability for these deficiencies was upheld by this court in appeals from two previous actions. See Maisano v. United States, 908…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States of America, Richard L. Stradley, Trustee, Etc. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. City Of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Donald Reyes, Robert JubicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Ronald James, and Kay James v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Pineda-MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Juan Pineda-MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API