Legal Opinion

United States v. Pineda-Moreno

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 11, 2010No. 08-30385PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether law enforcement officers violate a suspect’s Fourth Amendment rights when they enter the curtilage of his home and attach a mobile tracking device to the undercarriage of his car.

I

A

On May 28, 2007, a Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) special agent noticed a group of men purchasing a large quantity of fertilizer from a Home Depot. Recognizing the fertilizer as a type frequently used to grow marijuana, he followed the men as they left the store and saw them drive away in a silver 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee. Law enforcement later identified…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. KnottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Perea-ReyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. AguiarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. Harry KatzinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API