Legal Opinion
United States v. Juan Pineda-Moreno
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 6, 2012No. 08-30385PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
In this matter which arose prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Jones, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 945, 181 L.Ed.2d 911 (2012), we must decide whether to apply the exclusionary rule where law enforcement agents attached mobile tracking devices to the underside of a defendant’s car and used those devices to track the car’s movements.
I
In 2007 the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) came to suspect that Juan Pineda-Moreno was growing marijuana in the back country of southern Oregon. That suspicion arose on May 28, when a DEA agent saw…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. Christopher McIver United States of America v. Brian EberleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Victor F. MaganaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Pineda-MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. AguiarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Harry KatzinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- United States v. SparksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Sherryanne ChristieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Erick D. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.