Legal Opinion

Ronald James, and Kay James v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 23, 1992No. 91-8056PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

Ronald and Kay James (plaintiffs) appeal summary judgment against them in their quiet title action against the United States under 28 U.S.C. § 2410. Although plaintiffs claimed procedural irregularities in the tax levy on Mr. James’ wages, the district court found that the case was, at heart, a challenge of the tax liability for which the levy was established and held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the matter. It then entered summary judgment in favor of the United States. 1

Mr. James did not file, income tax returns for the years 1981 and 1984. The federal Internal…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Tri-State Hospital Supply Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  2. Karen Dahn v. United States of America Maureen Ames and Keith FinleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. Patricia B. Farr v. United States of America United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Sydnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. Fostvedt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API