Legal Opinion
Teresa Bierman v. Governor Mark Dayton
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 22, 2016No. 14-3468PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Chief Judge.
Nine individual providers of direct support services (collectively, homecare providers) challenge the constitutionality of a Minnesota statute designating them state employees for the purpose of unionization. See Minn.Stat. § 179A.54. The homecare providers timely filed this interlocutory appeal from the district court’s 1 denial of their renewed motion preliminarily to enjoin the state from holding an election and certifying an exclusive representative. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We dismiss this present appeal as moot.
I. BACKGROUND
On May 24, 2013, Minnesota Governor Mark…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cmm Cable Rep., Inc., D/B/A Creative Media Management, Inc. v. Ocean Coast Properties, Inc., D/B/A Wpor-FmCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Jennifer Parrish v. Governor Mark DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nathan Rinne v. Camden CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- Little Rock Fam. Planning Svcs v. Leslie RutledgeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Bierman v. DaytonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Doe v. FrakesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2022
- King v. Marion Arkansas, City ofDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.