Legal Opinion
Jennifer Parrish v. Governor Mark Dayton
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 31, 2014No. 13-2739PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENTON, Circuit Judge.
Jennifer Parrish and other plaintiffs operate child-care businesses in their homes. They challenge the constitutionality of Minnesota’s Family Child Care Providers Representation Act (the Act). The district court 1 found plaintiffs’ claims unripe, dismissing the case without prejudice. This court granted plaintiffs an injunction pending appeal. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court dissolves the injunction and affirms the judgment of the district court.
Minnesota subsidizes child care for poor families by the Child Care Assistance Program. The Program…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ohio Forestry Assn., Inc. v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Missourians for Fiscal Accountability v. KlahrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Telescope Media Group v. Rebecca LuceroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Jonathan VaughtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Parsons v. McCannDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2015
- Guggenberger ex rel. Guggenberger v. StateDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.