Legal Opinion
Bierman v. Dayton
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 3, 2017No. Civil File No. 14-3021 (MJD/LIB)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER
Michael J. Davis, United States District Court
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on State Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Docket No. 88] and Defendant SEIU Healthcare Minnesota’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Docket No. 92]. Because Minnesota’s certification of SEIU did not infringe on Plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights, Defendants’ motions are granted.
II. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
1. Minnesota’s Homecare Program
The State of Minnesota has several programs through which it pays homecare providers to deliver vital “direct…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Branti v. FinkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rebecca Hill v. Service Employees InternationaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017