Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Kozlowski

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 18, 1977PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.

The plaintiff’s operator’s license was suspended for a period of at least one year by the defendant commissioner of motor vehicles pursuant to General Statutes §14-111 (c). The plaintiff appealed to the Court of Common Pleas and his appeal was sustained. The commissioner of motor vehicles has appealed from that judgment.

According to its memorandum of decision, the Court of Common Pleas sustained the appeal on the ground that the adjudicator abused his discretion in relying solely on hearsay statements which the court held were not competent evidence. We find that the appeal was properly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  3. Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  4. Klapproth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  5. Balch Pontiac-Buick, Inc. v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Caldor, Inc. v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Cassella v. Civil Service CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Industrial Claims Appeals Office v. Flower Stop Marketing Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Town of North Haven v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Bolt Technology Corp. v. DubnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API