Legal Opinion

Industrial Claims Appeals Office v. Flower Stop Marketing Corp.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 30, 1989No. 88SC370PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey

The Industrial Claims Appeals Office (panel) determined that claimant William Kilgore had been improperly denied unemployment compensation benefits because the decision of the referee was based solely on hearsay evidence contrary to Sims v. Industrial Commission, 627 P.2d 1107 (Colo.1981). The claimant’s employer, Flower Stop Marketing Corporation (Flower Stop), appealed and the court of appeals in Flower Stop Marketing Corporation v. Kilgore, 762 P.2d 747 (Colo.Ct.App.1988), held that Sims was no longer applicable to unemployment compensation cases. The court set aside the panel’s order and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Matter of Carroll v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Charnes v. LobatoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Reguero v. Teacher Standards & Practices CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Watker v. Vermont Parole BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. Stalcup v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Bestway Concrete & Tig Insurance Co v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Suetrack USA v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API