Legal Opinion

Bolt Technology Corp. v. Dubno

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 12, 1989No. 13648; 13652; 13653PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.

The plaintiffs, Bolt Technology Corporation, Olin Corporation, Inc., and Perkin-Elmer Corporation (taxpayers), brought appeals to the Superior Court from a determination of the defendant commissioner of revenue services (commissioner). Specifically, the commissioner disallowed certain commission expenses that each of the taxpayers claimed on its Connecticut cor*222poration business tax return. In the Superior Court, the taxpayers and the commissioner entered into stipulations for reservation, and the Superior Court agreed to reserve the issue presented in the stipulations to the Appellate Court.1…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Canaan Oil & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. GuckianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. State v. BarnettConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  3. SLI International Corp. v. CrystalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Berkley v. GavinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API