Legal Opinion

I.C.D. Industries, Inc. v. Federal Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-4105PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

Plaintiff ICD Industries (“ICD”) was insured under a policy issued by Federal Insurance Company (“Federal”) which, inter alia, afforded coverage resulting from an advertising injury. ICD has brought this declaratory judgment action claiming that it is entitled to recover attorney fees and costs it incurred in defending against a patent infringement action. Currently before the Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. Presented for resolution are two issues: (1) whether the patent infringement lawsuit brought against ICD can be…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Scopel v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Melrose Hotel Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Budtel Associates, LP v. Continental Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Heil Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1996
  5. Tradesoft Technologies, Inc. v. Franklin Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API