County of Martin v. Kampert
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Martin county to recover $1,679.50 upon defendants’ bond to pay expenses in connection with the proposed construction of a public ditch. The case was tried before Quinn, J., who made finding’s and ordered judgment for the amount demanded. Defendants’ motion for a new trial was denied. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
Upon the filing of a petition for the establishment of a county ditch, defendants executed and filed a bond in the sum of $1,000 conditioned to “pay all expenses, in case the county board of said county, or the court in case an appeal be taken * * * shall fail to establish said proposed public ditch.” Some time later they gave a second bond in like amount and with like conditions. The county board considered the petition and appointed an engineer to make the survey. The engineer made and filed his report. Thereupon three viewers who had been appointed entered upon their duties, and later…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Huling v. Kaw Valley Railway & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- State ex rel. Utick v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Pioneer Savings & Loan Co. v. BartschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Firemen's Insurance v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. HamptonOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- Johnson v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- In Re Judicial Ditch No. 12Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- In Re Judicial Ditch No. 9Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Clay v. ætna Life Ins. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.