Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Metcalf

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 7, 1988No. 88-139PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

The appellant and his wife filed a petition in the Franklin County Chancery Court to quiet title to the mineral interest in certain lands in Franklin County, Arkansas. The appellant only appeals from the order of the chancellor dismissing the petition and awarding the appellee (widow) the right to receive all proceeds from the mineral leases, rentals and royalties from oil and gas development and production upon the real estate here in question. The appellant argues that the trial court erred in dismissing his complaint and in finding that the appellee is entitled to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Glasgow v. GlasgowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  2. Krug v. ReissigWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Saunders v. SaundersIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Rye v. BaumannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  5. Corcorren v. SharumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hardie v. Estate of DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Wiener v. Farm Credit Bank of St. LouisDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1991
  3. Cummings v. ShultsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API