Cummings v. Shults

Karen R. Baker, Judge.

This is a boundary-line dispute. Appellant Roy Cummings appeals from the judgment of the Crawford County Circuit Court finding that he was estopped from proving either a boundary by agreement or by acquiescence. The trial court also quieted tide to the disputed parcel of land in appellee Norma Shults. Finding no error, we affirm.

The Shults property is located to the north of the Cummings property. The dispute is whether the parties agreed that a ditch or tree line, located on Shult’s property, would be the boundary between them, instead of the true boundary, located a…