Legal Opinion
Union Trust Co. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided May 17, 1939No. L. A. 16626PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The respondents, as the prevailing parties,
seek to recover their costs in a mandamus proceeding. The petition for the writ was filed in the District Court of Appeal. That court ordered the peremptory writ as prayed. On petition of the respondents the cause was transferred to this court for hearing and determination. This court on June 29, 1.938, denied the writ. (Union Trust Co. of San Diego v. Superior Court, 11 Cal. (2d) 449 [81 Pac. (2d) 150, 118 A. L. R. 259].) On July 29, 1938, the respondents filed a memorandum of costs together with a notice that a motion would be made during…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Gould v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Kaufman v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Clough v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
3Cited by8 opinions
- County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Copesky v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Oksner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Pipes v. HilderbrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Williams v. Santa Maria Joint Union High Sch. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.