Legal Opinion

Riyad Bank v. Al Gailani

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 2001No. 00-0688PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Phillips

This case involves the legality of a bank’s actions in foreclosing on accounts receivable a debtor pledged as collateral. The trial court concluded that the bank neither used commercially unreasonable collection methods under section 9.502 of the Uniform Commercial Code nor conducted an improper foreclosure sale under section 9.504. See Tex. Bus. & Com.Code §§ 9.502, 9.504. 1 The court of appeals, concluding that the debtors raised fact questions about the collection attempt under section 9.502, reversed the trial court’s judgment. 22 S.W.3d 560. The court did not reach the debtors’ claims…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Greathouse v. Charter National Bank-SouthwestTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. A.I. Root Company v. Computer/dynamics, Inc. And Management Assistance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  3. Daniell v. Citizens Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  4. Stanglin v. Keda Development Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Gordon & Associates, Inc. v. Cullen Bank/Citywest, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Katy Springs & Manufacturing, Inc. v. FavaloraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  2. Michael Diez v. Alaska Structures, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2015
  3. Martin K. Eby Construction Co. v. LAN/STV, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  4. Al Gailani v. Riyad Bank, Houston Agency, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
  5. Beardmore v. American Summit Financial Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API