Legal Opinion
Daniell v. Citizens Bank
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided June 30, 1988No. 13-87-238-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEERDEN, Justice.
The trial court granted a partial summary judgment, favoring Citizens Bank, a cross-plaintiff, on all of its issues except attorney’s fees in a suit over an insurance merger and an unpaid bank note. We reverse and remand.
By his original petition, Taylor Daniell sued NIA Financial Corporation (NIA), Sheldon Harrison, Lee M. Gallagher, Sherman Shivers, and Citizens Bank. He alleged fraud and misrepresentation in inducing him to merge his insurance agency with NIA and to personally guarantee a note with the bank. The bank filed a general denial and sued NIA, Daniell, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- MMP, Ltd. v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Yowell v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Pruske v. National Bank of Commerce of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of San Antonio v. Ritenour, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
- Ortiz v. Spann, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Columbia Rio Grande Regional Hospital v. Stover, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Gaynor v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Diaz v. Rankin, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- Chase Commercial Corp. v. Datapoint Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Long v. NCNB-Texas National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.