Legal Opinion
Midwestern Motor Transit, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 22, 1933No. 23851PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The only question presented is whether the finding and order of the commission revoking the intrastate certificate of the plaintiff in error is unreasonable or unlawful. It is not manifestly against the weight of the evidence; on the contrary, the several findings of the commission are abundantly supported by the evidence.
Counsel for the plaintiff in error contend that the action of the commission is in violation of Section 614-87, General Code. This section provides in substance that no certificate shall be revoked for failure to give service until the issuance of an order requiring such…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Clark v. PoorSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Sprout v. City of South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Scheible v. HoganOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- Detroit-Cincinnati Coach Line, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
- Public Service Commission v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1942
- Alspaugh v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- Blue Motor Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Lattavo Brothers, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1946