Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 14, 1988No. C5-87-2463PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Ted and Nadine Richardson appeal from summary judgment dismissing their claim in which they sought to stack personal injury protection benefits from their personal automobile insurance policy on top of benefits received from an employer’s policy. The Richardsons also seek review of a trial court order denying their motion to supplement the record and to vacate the judgment. We affirm.
FACTS
On September 16, 1983 appellants Ted and Nadine Richardson were seriously injured in a motor vehicle accident; it is undisputed that the other driver was at fault. The vehicle which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Kosloski v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Payne v. Mutual Fire & Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Western World Insurance Co. v. Anothen, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. HorejsiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Risk Level Determination of C.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Meyer v. Best Western Seville Plaza HotelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Bush Terrace Homeowners Ass'n v. RidgewayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Midway National Bank of St. Paul v. BollmeierCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Quam v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989