Legal Opinion

Frisbee v. O'Connor

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 1932No. Docket No. 8065PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

—Plaintiff, a resident and taxpayer of the city of Beverly Hills, sought to enjoin defendant, the city treasurer of the city of Beverly Hills, from paying a warrant in favor of the Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company in ■the sum of $315.26 for the first year’s premium due upon an insurance policy issued by said company to Charles Gouts Blair, an employee of said city. The trial court overruled the demurrer interposed by defendant and upon the failure of said defendant to answer, granted the injunction. Defendant appeals upon the judgment-roll.

The policy was issued to said' employee under…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Madera v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Oro Elec. Corp. v. R.R. Comm'n of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Egan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. City of Long Beach v. LisenbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State ex rel. Thompson v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Voorhees v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  2. County of Alameda v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Shealor v. City of LodiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Wheeler v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Marabuto v. Town of EmeryvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API