Legal Opinion
Beliveau v. Caras
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 6, 1995No. CV 94-5398 RAP (CTx)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL
PAEZ, District Judge.
On October 17, 1994, the Court heard defendants Chris Caras’ and James Rickell’s motion for partial dismissal of plaintiffs First Amended Complaint. After fully considering the moving, opposition, and reply papers, exhibits submitted in connection with the request to take judicial notice, authorities, and counsel’s oral arguments, the Court denies the motion with respect to the First, Seventh, and Eighth Causes of Action, and grants the motion without leave to amend the Second, Third,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Nl Industries, Inc. v. Stuart M. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Kerry Ellison v. Nicholas F. Brady, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Albert Dicenso v. Henry G. Cisneros, Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, and Christina L. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Brown v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Lawrence v. Courtyards at Deerwood Ass'n, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- Williams v. Poretsky Management, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
- Noah v. AssorDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.