Legal Opinion

Moore v. Kildall

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1920No. 15772PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Grimshaw, J., entered July 19, 1919, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This action was brought by the state bank examiner, in charge of and liquidating the German-American Mercantile Bank, an insolvent state banking corporation, to recover a balance due upon a demand promissory note in the sum of $3,240.45, executed by the defendant to the German-American Mer*505cantile Bank on September 25, 1916, and for the foreclosure of certain collateral securities. The defense was, in substance, that there was no consideration for the note and that, at the time the note was executed, an oral agreement was entered into between the maker of the note and the president and cashier…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Golden v. CervenkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Bradley Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. HeyburnWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Anderson v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Bank of California v. StarrettWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Tassel v. McGrailWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bond v. WiegardtWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. First Bank of Cordova v. TjosevigWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Putnam v. ChaseOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Dove v. Cowlitz Valley BankWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. MacCallum-Donahoe Finance Co. v. DevoeWashington Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API