Legal Opinion

Anoke v. Twitter

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 2024No. A168675Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 8/27/24; Modified and Certified for Pub. 9/18/24 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE SARAH ANOKE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A168675 v. TWITTER, INC., et al., (City and County of San Francisco Super. Ct. No. CPF23518034) Defendants and Respondents. To discourage delays in arbitrations, Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.971 provides a remedy when a company’s share of the initial arbitration fees “are not paid within 30 days” of the invoice. (§ 1281.97, subds. (a)(1), (b).) In an employment- related…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dean v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Moran v. Murtaugh Miller Meyer & Nelson, LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Rey v. Madera Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Capo for Better Representation v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API